Friday, September 14, 2007

Unexpected Dinner Guest

This guy is a regular outside our kitchen window at night. We enjoy his company, but have yet to see him catch a meal. The moths really do tease him wickedly.

It is always well into darkness now by the time we start cooking dinner. There are still a lot of things to wrap up in and around our new home before the onset of cooler weather. It's a race against slackening daylight and that doesn't leave me much in the way of down time.

More updates to come.



At September 15, 2007 2:03 PM, Blogger A Few Reservations said...

Hey Jade,
Random question: You didn't used to live in Portland (well, Lake Oswego technically)? Just wondering if you're the Jade I knew back then. Because the world really is that small, and there aren't a lot of Jades I've met.
Jenn (

At September 16, 2007 4:33 PM, Blogger O Mama Mia said...

Oh you seriously live in the coolest place ever! And I thought the birds we have in our yards were fun to watch.

At September 17, 2007 4:40 AM, Blogger ericswan said...

Great British fry-up under threat
Getting eggspensive
By Lucy Sherriff → More by this authorPublished Friday 14th September 2007 15:12 GMTJobsite - find your next IT job quickly & easily The cost of a full English is set to soar, as animal feed prices push up the cost of eggs, bacon and dairy produce. Wheat has also hit a record high, so toast isn't going to be the budget option, either.

According to The Times UK egg producer Noble Foods, which supplies roughly 40 per cent of the UK's eggs, said that farmers were being driven out of the chicken-wrangling business by rising feed prices.

In spite of the rapidly approaching laying season, farmers are cancelling orders of chicks, the firm said. It warned that the move could mean egg shortages in the lead up to Christmas, for the first time since the Second World War.

And it's not just eggs. Feed costs are affecting pig farmers and dairy farmers, thanks in no small part to the early summer flooding in the UK. The poor weather has caused a shortage of local wheat, exacerbating high prices globally.

Pork, the mainstay of a decent fry-up in its sausagey and bacon form, is costing too much money to produce. Farmers are losing an average of £23 per pig. Supermarket bacon must rise by 13p per pack to offset that loss, while eggs would have to go up by 20p on half a dozen.

Milk and therefore butter are also under pressure. The Milk Development Council claims that shops are selling butter at a loss, and farm co-operative First Milk says we should brace for a five per cent drop in milk supplies after the summer washout.

We'd like to blame biofuel, so we can make a nice joke about driving to the supermarket on a tank of corn oil to find empty shelves. But it seems that in the vain search for a science or IT-related angle on this story we must instead lay the blame at the feet of global warming, and extreme weather events. Ah well. ®

At September 19, 2007 2:09 PM, Blogger Jade said...

I'm sorry Jenn, but no I am not she. I'm afraid I am a certified Seattleite. But it IS true that the world is really that small, so perhaps you will come across her again.

Thanks, o mama mia, sometimes it feels like we do live in the coolest place ever, but I'm sure it isn't THE coolest place ever. Don't let our little tree frogs diminsh your bird-watching excitement! Watching birds that visit my yard has always brought me unfathomable joy. I bet you get cardinals out there, and I've always been a touch jealous of that. :)

Yep, ericswan, the price of feed is rising. I think fuel costs factors into that equation too. The advantage of keeping ducks instead of chickens is that ducks can forage for a larger percentage of their food -- that is those that are allowed to free-range, anyway.

At October 03, 2007 7:05 AM, Blogger ericswan said...

AUG 17 2007




Erwin Simon, President and CEO
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc,
4600 Sleepytime Drive
Boulder, Colorado 80301-3292

Dear Mr. Simon:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed the regulatory status of the ingredients declared on the label of your Celestial Seasonings® Zingers to GO™ Tangerine Orange Wave Herb Tea (hereinafter "Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea"). Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea is adulterated under section 402(a)(2)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. 342(a)(2)(C)] because it bears or contains stevia, which is an unsafe food additive. The regulations pertaining to food additives are located in Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR), Part 170. You can find copies of the Act and these regulations through links in FDA's home page at

Notwithstanding your use of the term "Herbal Supplement" to identify the product and your use of a supplement facts label for nutrition labeling, your Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea is subject to regulation as a conventional food and not a dietary supplement. Section 201(ff) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 321(ff)] defines the term "dietary supplement." As defined by the Act, a dietary supplement does not include a product represented for use as a conventional food or as a sole item of a meal or the diet [21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(2)(B)]. Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea is represented as a conventional food within the meaning of section 201(f) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 321(f)]. Examples of label statements that establish that your powdered drink mix product is represented as a conventional food, and accordingly is not a dietary supplement, include the following:

• The label declares "Iced Tea Mix" adjacent to the words "Herbal Supplement" on the Principal Display Panel (PDP).

• The label states that "Zingers To Go are an easy and delicious all-natural way to get your daily eight glasses of water."

• The label states that the product is "a sunny combination of the flavor of tangy tangerines and juicy oranges with refreshing, naturally caffeine free herb tea."

Any substance intentionally added to a conventional food, such as a powdered drink mix product, must be used in accordance with a food additive regulation approving the substance for that use, unless the substance is generally recognized as safe (GRAS) among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety ("qualified experts") under the conditions of its intended use, or is otherwise exempt from the food additive definition in section 201(s) of the Act [21 U.S.C. 321(s)].

FDA's regulations in 21 CFR Part 170 describe criteria for eligibility for classification of a food ingredient as GRAS. Under 21 CFR 170.30(a), general recognition of safety must be based only on the views of qualified experts. The basis of such views may be either (1) scientific procedures or (2) in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958, through experience based on common use in food. General recognition of safety requires common knowledge about the substance throughout the scientific community knowledgeable about the safety of substances directly or indirectly added to food.

FDA's regulations in 21 CFR Part 170 define "common use in food" and establish criteria for eligibility for classification as GRAS through experience based on common use in food. Under 21 CFR 170.3(f), "[c]ommon use in food means a substantial history of consumption of a substance for food use by a significant number of consumers." Under 21 CFR 170.30(c)(1), "[g]eneral recognition of safety through common use in food prior to January 1, 1958, shall be based solely on food use of the substance prior to January 1, 1958, and shall ordinarily be based upon generally available data and information." Importantly, however, the fact that a substance was added to food before 1958 does not, in itself, demonstrate that such use is safe, unless the pre-1958 use is sufficient to demonstrate to qualified experts that the substance is safe when added to food.

Similarly, FDA's regulations in 21 CFR Part 170 define "scientific procedures" and establish criteria for eligibility for classification as GRAS through scientific procedures Under 21 CFR 170.3(h), "[s]cientific procedures include those human, animal, analytical, and other scientific studies, whether published or unpublished, appropriate to establish the safety of a substance." Under 21 CFR 170.30(b) based upon scientific procedures shall require the same quantity and quality of scientific evidence as is required to obtain approval of a food additive regulation for the ingredient." Section 170.30(b) further states that general recognition of safety through scientific procedures is ordinarily based upon published studies, which may be corroborated by unpublished studies and other data and information.

FDA's regulations in 21 CFR Part 170 define "safe" and "safety." Under 21 CFR 170.3(i), "[s]afe or safety means that there is a reasonable certainty in the minds of competent scientists that the substance is not harmful under the intended conditions of use." The regulation provides that, in determining safety, the following factors are to be considered: (1) The probable consumption of the substance and of any substance formed in or on food because of its use; (2) the cumulative effect of the substance in the diet, taking into account any chemically or pharmacologically related substance or substances in such diet; and (3) safety factors which, in the opinion of qualified experts, are generally recognized as appropriate. Such safety factors ordinarily are established through extensive testing in animals to determine whether consumption of the ingredient produces adverse effects when consumed chronically (i.e., on a daily basis over the course of a lifetime (Ref. 1)).

While FDA has received inquiries and petitions for the use of stevia or stevia extracts in food, data and information necessary to support the safe use have been lacking. In fact, literature reports have raised safety concerns about the use of stevia, including concerns about control of blood sugar, and effects on the reproductive, cardiovascular and renal systems.

In light of these safety concerns, the use of stevia in your Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea product does not satisfy the criteria for GRAS status outlined above. Further, FDA is not aware of any other exemption from the food additive definition that would apply to stevia for use as an ingredient in powdered drink mix products. Therefore, stevia used in this manner is a food additive under section 201(s) of the Act and is subject to the provisions of section 409 of the Act [21 U.S.C. 348]. Under section 409, a food additive is required to be approved by FDA for its intended use prior to marketing. Stevia (Stevia rebaudiuna) is not an approved food additive for use in powdered drink mix products. Therefore, your stevia-containing Zingers Tangerine Orange Tea is adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(2)(C) of the Act.

This letter is not intended to be an all-inclusive review of all labeling and products your firm markets. While reviewing your website at, we noticed that there are various flavors of your Celestial Seasoningso Zingers to GO™ powdered drink mix products that are labeled as containing stevia. It is your responsibility to ensure that all of your products are in compliance with the Act and its implementing regulations.

Failure to promptly correct the violation specified above may result in enforcement action without further notice. Enforcement action may include seizure of violative products and/or injunction against the manufacturers and distributors of violative products.

Please advise this office in writing within fifteen (15) days from your receipt of this letter as to the specific steps you have taken to correct the violations noted above and to assure that similar violations do not occur. Your response should include any documentation necessary to show that correction has been achieved. If you cannot complete all corrections before you respond, please explain the reason for your delay and the date by which each such item will be corrected and documented.

Please send your reply to Attention: Lynn Szybist, Compliance Officer, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Compliance, Division of Enforcement, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway (HFS-608), College Park, Maryland 20740. If you have any questions regarding any issue in this letter, please contact Ms. Szybist at (301) 436-2040.



Joseph R. Baca
Office of Compliance
Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition

cc: Food and Drug Administration
Denver District Office
Attn: Belinda Collins, District Director
6th Avenue & Kipling Street
Building 20
Denver, Colorado 80225

1. Toxicological Testing of Food Additives, available at


Post a Comment

<< Home